Text

so yesterday during thanksgiving my nephew was kinda being a little shit in the way that it is totally normal for kids to be shits 

i.e. griping about his mom not letting him get cool clothes (skinny jeans) or highlights in his hair, and pausing every so often to bust on his siblings for various things

and you know, i was just sitting there occasionally throwing out a comment like hey you can make whatever you wear cool tho, you don’t have to follow fashion bc you’re the cool kid you’re the one who makes it fashionable and chastising him a little when he’d bust on his siblings if it was warranted like if he got out of hand and was just being cruel or rude with it

and just like all of that was fine but at some point the rest of the family i guess started busting on him i guess as a way to deter how he was treating his mother and his siblings, which i don’t really think is the proper approach in the first place

but the thing i really couldn’t handle is that all of the approach to discouraging from this behavior was really just gender policing. instead of discouraging him from the actually negative behavior, the consensus became making fun of his interest in fashionable choices by implying he’d start wanting to wear his sister’s stylish boots, or play with barbies. 

and just.

how is that okay?

how am i the only adult in the room that understood how that was just bullying? a bunch of adults picking on a little boy? how is that right?

i couldn’t say anything, bc it was thanksgiving, and it’s not my side of the family, so i’d just be ruining the mood, or telling someone how to raise their kid. i had to go upstairs bc i was going to end up saying something if i stayed and i knew i couldn’t do that.

i just feel so tiny. i know that what i saw was just what he’s going to encounter in the world no matter what. if it didn’t happen in that room it would happen in a classroom, or at a friend’s house. but i want so much to help him feel loved, and accepted, and able to do things he wants to do without feeling like he needs to bring anyone else down in the process. but all he sees is adults using abusive tactics to make their point, and encouraging negative associations with women that will further encourage the negative treatment of his sister. 

i just

feel

so

tiny

Link

alone-with-cas-in-purgatory:

bonnienoire:

justife:

bonnienoire:

just in case you didn’t fucking know

bisexual DOES NOT automatically infer attraction to only binary genders AND EVEN SAYING THAT IN THE FIRST PLACE IS BIPHOBIC AS HELL AND IGNORANT AS FUCK

HERE’S WHY FROM AN ACTUALLY BI PERSON

  • bisexuality…

Dear bonnienoire, thank you for this, thanks for offending and making me rather annoyed with this post. I see what you are saying, you are offended also by these people, but you have just offended me. A persons sexuality and Gender are two different things. A persons gender, in a simple way to put it, is what they present themselves as, Masculine, Feminine, etc. Sexuality is sexual feelings towards a persons sex, someones sex  is what they have in between their legs (sex organ) The terms you are using in this post to explain bisexuality aren’t the right terms. Binary, is used for GENDER to explain gender-norms as people would say. Trans (I’m assuming you mean Transgender because most people would say trans for short) is again for GENDER, trans people identify themselves with the opposite gender then their biological one. As well as gender-queer, where they don’t have a specific gender, they don’t identify with one. Most people, like you, associate GENDER and SEX as the same thing but they are not. I identify as bigender, so this is how I behave and identify myself as for social standards. My gender identity doesn’t have anything to do with my sexual preference. 

somewhere, you totally missed what i was saying completely. like — the entire thing. i’m sorry you got offended but i honestly am not sure how it happened? i assure you i DEFINITELY know that gender =/= sex, and further that gender =/= sexuality (i mean how would that even work???). 

from your last line i gather you may have gotten upset because i specified the bi in bisexual to be “same” and “otherness”, which really doesn’t fit for someone who identifies as bigender. however, a prefix doesn’t carry every other word it’s attached to with it. bi means two, but i defined those two as being different directions of my personal sexual attraction, towards sameness and towards otherness. that still leaves all the space in the world for you to define bi in bigender as in two distinct gender presentations, and not two directions on a continuum, if that’s what you so desire.

so i’m sorry to have offended you, but i honestly think this is a misunderstanding. if you still feel that i have policed your identity in defining my own, please let me know and i’ll try and understand what went wrong with my wording here.

(via morethanjuststerek)

Quote
"

…[T]hese are PHOTOGRAPHS. These are the objects police use to identify criminals. These are things that explicitly and routinely constitute evidence. They are precisely the opposite of anonymous—they are vehicles of anti-anonymity. And yet many people in this community bizarrely insist that they are somehow irrelevant, and that posting them is not a violation of a person’s privacy.

Whereas connecting a username to someone’s actual name—not to their body, just to another label, another way they exist in the world—is a MASSIVE PRIVACY VIOLATION.

The implication is that privacy resides in your name, not in your body. If you’re a man with the luxury to think this way, your body is understood as a sort of irrelevant accessory to your name, the thing that really matters. An invasion of privacy isn’t interpreted as a literal invasion. Although they plainly are, men’s bodies aren’t understood as being capable of being penetrated. People with this mentality don’t see a photograph as an invasion of privacy because they don’t experience the image of their bodies as being connected to the privacy that is capable of being violated….

"

The whole thing is worth reading, but I clipped this part because it talks about how gender affects one’s notion of ‘privacy’. It’s ridiculous to assert that publishing someone’s name without their consent is a privacy violation while also asserting that publishing their photograph without consent isn’t.

Also, many times, women and girls have been named/identified just through their images. This is particularly true for those whose pictures are stolen from social media websites and online photo accounts. This can open them up to real life stalking, harassment, and even assault. So there’s the real risk of female internet users having their privacy violated in multiple ways.

(via downlo)

(via vickiexz)

Quote
"When 1,100 Michigan elementary students were asked to describe what life would be like if they were the opposite sex, over 40 percent of the girls saw advantages to being male; they would have better jobs, higher incomes, and more respect. Ninety-five percent of the boys saw no advantage to being female, and a substantial number thought suicide would be preferable."

Deborah Rhode in Speaking of Sex: The Denial of Gender Inequality quoted by Andrea Dworkin in Scapegoat

(via badwulf)

(Source: anarchistsoup, via justsoelmo)

Tags: gender
Link

tellmanystories:

AAhlife-in-neon:

Study exposes unethical biosexism practiced upon pregnant women.

Emphasis mine:

The pregnant women targeted are at risk for having a child born with the condition congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), an endocrinological condition that can result in female fetuses being born with intersex or more male-typical genitals and brains. Women genetically identified as being at risk are given dexamethasone, a synthetic steroid, off-label starting as early as week five of the first trimester to try to “normalize” the development of those fetuses, which are female and CAH-affected. Because the drug must be administered before doctors can know if the fetus is female or CAH-affected, only one in eight of those exposed are the target type of fetus.

The off-label intervention does not prevent CAH; it aims only at sex normalization.

The new report provides clear evidence that:

  • For more than 10 years, medical societies repeatedly but ultimately impotently expressed high alarm at use of this off-label intervention outside prospective clinical trials, because it is so high risk and because nearly 90 percent of those exposed cannot benefit.
  • Clinician proponents of the intervention have been interested in whether the intervention can reduce rates of tomboyism, lesbianism and bisexuality, characteristics they have termed “behavioral masculinization.”

The paper is available for free download at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/m1523l7615744552/?MUD=MP

There’s so much more, I encourage you to read it all. It’s disgusting.

Of all the biosexist bullshit I have ever heard, this has to be up there on the list, right below sex-selective abortion. Actually, you know what, I’m gonna put this one higher, because the kid is actually being born and has to live a whole life with the consequences of a fucked up and sexist decision by a parent wooed into it by an unethical doctor.

WOW. WTF. This is awful.

I AM GOING TO FUCKING KILL SOMETHING

(via karnythia)

Text

justagoose:

Gender roles.

Are horrible.

The end.

perfect blog post everyone else go home

(Source: saminalcrackers)

Photo
freececemcdonald:

Hello CeCe Supporters!

The Call-In campaign for CeCe to get her correct dosage of hormones was an incredible success!  The prison’s health administration were so “inconvenienced”, they were compelled to clear the issue immediately.

CeCe is doing fine and looking fabulous.  She is steadily devouring the books that everyone is sending - currently she is reading Angela Davis and is totally inspired.

She spoke a bit about the push from some supporters to launch large-scale campaigns to get Gov. Mark Dayton to pardon her, and/or to have her moved to a women’s facility.  She talked about how these campaigns would not only not benefit her, but how they exceptionalize her in a way that she doesn’t want.  

The pardoning process would not only be painful for her, but were she even to get considered, it wouldn’t be until after she served her sentence.  She thinks about people incarcerated for much longer terms than she, and for incredibly minor offenses (mostly drug related). Even if the emotional hardship of the process was something she felt up for, and even if the slim chance of it working actually succeeded, the outcome of her getting a pardon while others sat in prison is antithetical to her values and the whole reason she is struggling against this racist system in the first place. 

As for being transfered to a women’s facility, her thoughts are:  Prison sucks.  Period.  CeCe is not safe in any prison, women’s or men’s.  Prisons are not safe for anyone.  Period.  CeCe asserts (as do we) that incarcerated individuals should be able to decide for themselves where they would be safest within the system.  For now, CeCe is fine being in a men’s facility.  For supporters to push for her to be transferred from one hell to another only serves the purpose of misdirecting energy away from the real problems of incarceration in america, and the problem of the Prison Industrial Complex as a whole.  

To sum it up:  CeCe does not want supporters to launch long-term campaigns on her behalf that exceptionalize her situation..  Also importantly, these specific campaigns: a pardon from Gov. Dayton and getting transferred to a women’s facility, wouldn’t actually be beneficial to her at all.  Short term campaigns such as call-ins to administration, and media blasts, are targeted efforts that let the DOC know that CeCe has widespread support, and it sends a message that we are watching them and will respond to prisoner’s needs - CeCe’s today, and other incarcerated transpeople tomorrow.

CeCe sends her love and gratitude to everyone who called-in on her behalf.  She wishes that every wrongly incarcerated person had the same incredible support that she has, and prays for a world without bars, a world without cells.

Towards Justice,
CeCe Support Committee

freececemcdonald:

Hello CeCe Supporters!

The Call-In campaign for CeCe to get her correct dosage of hormones was an incredible success!  The prison’s health administration were so “inconvenienced”, they were compelled to clear the issue immediately.

CeCe is doing fine and looking fabulous.  She is steadily devouring the books that everyone is sending - currently she is reading Angela Davis and is totally inspired.

She spoke a bit about the push from some supporters to launch large-scale campaigns to get Gov. Mark Dayton to pardon her, and/or to have her moved to a women’s facility.  She talked about how these campaigns would not only not benefit her, but how they exceptionalize her in a way that she doesn’t want.  

The pardoning process would not only be painful for her, but were she even to get considered, it wouldn’t be until after she served her sentence.  She thinks about people incarcerated for much longer terms than she, and for incredibly minor offenses (mostly drug related). Even if the emotional hardship of the process was something she felt up for, and even if the slim chance of it working actually succeeded, the outcome of her getting a pardon while others sat in prison is antithetical to her values and the whole reason she is struggling against this racist system in the first place. 

As for being transfered to a women’s facility, her thoughts are:  Prison sucks.  Period.  CeCe is not safe in any prison, women’s or men’s.  Prisons are not safe for anyone.  Period.  CeCe asserts (as do we) that incarcerated individuals should be able to decide for themselves where they would be safest within the system.  For now, CeCe is fine being in a men’s facility.  For supporters to push for her to be transferred from one hell to another only serves the purpose of misdirecting energy away from the real problems of incarceration in america, and the problem of the Prison Industrial Complex as a whole.  

To sum it up:  CeCe does not want supporters to launch long-term campaigns on her behalf that exceptionalize her situation..  Also importantly, these specific campaigns: a pardon from Gov. Dayton and getting transferred to a women’s facility, wouldn’t actually be beneficial to her at all.  Short term campaigns such as call-ins to administration, and media blasts, are targeted efforts that let the DOC know that CeCe has widespread support, and it sends a message that we are watching them and will respond to prisoner’s needs - CeCe’s today, and other incarcerated transpeople tomorrow.

CeCe sends her love and gratitude to everyone who called-in on her behalf.  She wishes that every wrongly incarcerated person had the same incredible support that she has, and prays for a world without bars, a world without cells.

Towards Justice,
CeCe Support Committee

(via brashblacknonbeliever)

Text

i get so mad every time i see a genderbend of a female character as a male

oh really? there’s finally a really awesome female character and your reaction is let’s make them a male?

because clearly fucking no one’s tired of awesome male characters

let’s have more of those.

Video

I just wanna call attention to this section with Kerry from the Angry Eye experiment, because I’m getting really sick of a lot of the comparisons between gay acceptance and racial acceptance on my dashboard, espicially when it comes to the issue of marriage.

Your experience as a white homosexual person, or a white person of genderqueer or trans* expression/identity, is frankly incomparable to the experiences of a person of color in this country.

Stop. Just stop.

part 1 here

Text

Hey. I have a question about gender.

justagoose:

So like. What is it? I’m really confused, and just trying to get information. It has nothing to do with our bodies, and really not much to do with sexuality. Assuming no personality traits are associated with either binary gender, what really are the differences between identifying male or female?

It seems to me that we’re all the same, neutral gender, but I probably just really don’t get it, and would like to be enlightened on how some people feel they identify differently, when I would say we’re all people. Anyone?

Well I’m no expert here but I’ll give this a go.

Gender is a social construct — it’s a collection of skills, behaviors, preferences, and physical/emotional traits that society deems as a separate collective entity. In American culture, we have “man/masculine” and “woman/feminine” as those collective entities, and these entities are predetermined for us at birth by society as a whole. It means that, upon recognition of our physical sex, we are assigned our specific collection of information which in turn, predetermines what our role in society is expected to be. 

The reason why gender conversations are important is that concept of “separate collective entity”. A person’s actual collection of skills/behaviors/etc/so forth is, in our culture, seldom allowed to intersect or overlap with the “separate collective entity” that consists of the opposite gender identity’s role without consequences of some kind. Society punishes those who do not fit into their assigned gender role, though all punishments are not equal. A female trades a modicum of perceived attractiveness should she ascribe to masculine traits such as assertiveness, aggression, or even wearing masculine clothes that are not tailored to her figure in the traditional feminine manner. A male trades a good deal of respect and power by ascribing to “feminine” traits such as an interest in fashion, a preference for small cute dogs instead of larger ones, or emotional sensitivity. 

In short, it’s not really that people are naturally “neutral gender”, but more that individuals are more complex than the simple bisection our society forces upon us. Gender isn’t even a spectrum in the traditional sense of how our society presents it. There are cultures where their are three or more genders — a specturm isn’t an appropriate analogy for what gender actually is, because of that. Gender is simply an abstraction that was created for the express purpose of identifying a person before getting to know them. It’s a method of stereotyping.

That doesn’t make gender as a concept necessarily bad, by the way. A stereotype is only damaging when it is considered truth, and evidence to the latter is considered a freakish outlier to the norm, causing opinions based off of stereotypes become immutable as a result. Stereotypes as a concept are not inherently bad. It’s the ignorance of what people do based off of what is meant to be a shortcut for communication — things like cutting off communication, outright violence, erasing individual experiences, among other possibilities — that is bad.

So yeah, I hope that helps. 

(Source: saminalcrackers)

Photo
typingfrantically:

Let me talk to you about books.
Specifically, one book. This book.
This book should be a best seller. This book should be required reading for graduating from high school. Before you get that diploma, you read this book.
This book deals with debunking “Neurosexism,” which is a very fancy term for all of that evolutionary psychology bullshit that people spill about those “brain differences” between boys and girls.
This book debunks such myths as:
Boys are better at math than girls
Women make crappy lawyers/business CEOs/etc, as their brains are not cut out for aggression.
Men make crappy counselors/primary school teachers/primary parents/etc, as their brains are not cut out for empathy.
MEN ARE BUILT FOR GOING OUT AND HUNTING WHILE WOMEN ARE BUILT FOR STAYING HOME AND BABYMAKING IT’S NOT SEXISM IT’S JUST BIOLOGY
And many other such myths.
Furthermore, this book covers topics such as: 
Neurosexism and gender perceptions in multiple races (as this is not a singularly white experience, just as the western world isn’t a singularly white experience)
Sex discrimination in the workplace, and how women are (or, more often, are not) allowed to behave
How science is used (badly) to support many of these claims
Experiences of trans* people, both through interviews and empirical studies.
AND FINALLY - It is all brilliantly researched, cited, compiled - and it’s easy to read! Cordelia Fine actually manages to be funny while writing this, which I think is important, because it makes all of this information infinitely accessible.
Delusions of Gender has reinforced what Oberlin taught me: The gender binary is stupid and arbitrary, and dangerous. And it is a self-perpetuating bias that needs to be addressed to be overcome.

*adds to amazon wishlist*

typingfrantically:

Let me talk to you about books.

Specifically, one book. This book.

This book should be a best seller. This book should be required reading for graduating from high school. Before you get that diploma, you read this book.

This book deals with debunking “Neurosexism,” which is a very fancy term for all of that evolutionary psychology bullshit that people spill about those “brain differences” between boys and girls.

This book debunks such myths as:

  • Boys are better at math than girls
  • Women make crappy lawyers/business CEOs/etc, as their brains are not cut out for aggression.
  • Men make crappy counselors/primary school teachers/primary parents/etc, as their brains are not cut out for empathy.
  • MEN ARE BUILT FOR GOING OUT AND HUNTING WHILE WOMEN ARE BUILT FOR STAYING HOME AND BABYMAKING IT’S NOT SEXISM IT’S JUST BIOLOGY
  • And many other such myths.

Furthermore, this book covers topics such as: 

  • Neurosexism and gender perceptions in multiple races (as this is not a singularly white experience, just as the western world isn’t a singularly white experience)
  • Sex discrimination in the workplace, and how women are (or, more often, are not) allowed to behave
  • How science is used (badly) to support many of these claims
  • Experiences of trans* people, both through interviews and empirical studies.

AND FINALLY - It is all brilliantly researched, cited, compiled - and it’s easy to read! Cordelia Fine actually manages to be funny while writing this, which I think is important, because it makes all of this information infinitely accessible.

Delusions of Gender has reinforced what Oberlin taught me: The gender binary is stupid and arbitrary, and dangerous. And it is a self-perpetuating bias that needs to be addressed to be overcome.

*adds to amazon wishlist*

(Source: faetrouble, via livelaughawesome)

Photoset

forgetpolitics:

For anyone who only sees gender and sex in black and white, here’s proof by the lovely humon that nature is just as fluid with representations of gender and sex as we are.

(via mrs-steph)

Quote
"Terms such as ‘child,’ ‘youth,’ and ‘teenager,’ while nominally gender neutral, are generally assumed to be male, and female experiences of youth must always be distinguished as such with gender-specific pronouns. Entertainments and experiences created for children invariably assume male experience as the norm, so that little girls watching a film such as Bambi must perform a cross-gender identification in order to sympathize with the fawn and his forest friends. From an early age, girls become adept at this kind of flexible identification with role models, while boys are rarely presented with an opportunity to do so. Thus, girls read Hardy Boys mysteries as well as Nancy Drew, and learn to enjoy action movies as well as the ‘chick flicks’ that make their boyfriends squirm."

— Jacqueline Warwick, Girl Groups, Girl Culture (via wearingraincoats)

(via lipsredasroses)

Photoset

Dad: Why do you think they do that?
Girl: Because the companies who make these try to trick the girls into buying the pink stuff instead of stuff boys want to buy.
[x]

(via saminalcrackers)

Quote
"If a man acts in accordance with the norms of masculinity, he will not be
penalized but will gain privilege (or there may be some harm, *but the
harm is outweighed by the privilege gained*). Serious penalty for men
comes only when they stray from the norms of masculinity (or other
norms). But, then they aren’t oppressed because they are men, but because
they are not meeting a particular standard.

A woman who acts in accordance with the norms of femininity *is*
penalized for her conformity. Eg., women who are indecisive are acting in a
stereotypically feminine manner, and are mocked for being indecisive,
are turned down for jobs, etc. And a woman who is decisive is also
penalized for her lack of femininity. Women experience social
sanctions for both conformity and non-conformity to the norms of
femininity."

— Jennifer McCrickerd, Drake University (via lawsonry)